Alawe Wins Court case Against Aggrieved PeluPelu Obas


Alawe of ilawe Ekiti

The case instituted by aggrieved PeluPelu Obas in Ekiti State at an Ado Ekiti High court challenging the appointment of the Alawe of Ilawe, HRM, Oba Adebanji Ajibade Alabi, AFUNTADE 1, as the Chairman of Ekiti State Council of Traditional Rulers in 2019, was on Friday, 8th July, 2022 struck out by the presiding Justice Oluwatoyin Abodunde.

This was made known  in a  press release on Monday by the media adviser to Alawe,High chief Ajibade Olubunmi.

The litigants led by the Ajero of Ijero Ekiti, HRM Oba Joseph Adewole had gone to Court in a suit number HAD/76/2019, challenging the validity of the state government’s appointment of the Alawe of Ilawe Ekiti ,HRM Oba Adebanji Ajibade Alabi, AFUNTADE 1 aa the chairman of Ekiti State Council of Traditional Rulers (2019 – 2021).


They had dragged the Ekiti State Governor,the Attorney General of the State and HRM Oba Adebanji Ajibade Alabi to Court . Barr, Gbenga Daramola represented the Governor while Barr, Dele Adesina SAN, Femi Falana SAN, Prof Dayo Akomolede and Dr E. K. Adetifa represented the Alawe. The aggrieved monarchs were represented by Barr Obafemi Adewale SAN and Barr Ajayi Owoseni .

The defence team raised several legal issues and objections before the court for determination and resolutions. The defence counsels therefore asked the court to rule on legal issues raised.

The Court ruled and resolved as follows : On whether the application is not an abuse of court process?
Court held that the recent application seeking indefinite adjournment as an abuse of court process and resolved in favor of the defendants jointly and severally
On whether the application is not an attempt at forum shopping should the court grant the application, the court would be encouraging forum shopping? This was resolved in favor of the defendants/applicants. On whether the application can be taken when the issue of jurisdiction has been raised?
On the issue of jurisdiction raised ,the court hinted at this point that the claimant/applicant is aware that the substantive suit brought by way of originating summon is shaky and that
the issue of further adjournment canvassed for by the claimants was also not allowed stressing that a claimant/applicant is not allowed to approbate and reprobate and that the instant application is out of line.

Justice Oluwatoyin Abodunde therefore refused the prayer of the claimant/applicant and struck out the entire Suit HAD/76/ 2019..

Leave a Reply